Restore tests are missing
The jobs finish, files exist and alerts look quiet, but nobody can show a recent restore test that matches a real incident.
Services / SQL Server recovery readiness
I review SQL Server backups, restore tests, and recovery steps before you need them in production.
Use this when backups exist, but restore tests, recovery timing, validation or HA and DR behavior are not clear enough.
Backup details
Send backup jobs, retention, recent restore tests, RTO/RPO targets and the recovery concern you need answered.
Restore review
I check backup chains, restore paths, timing, validation steps, permissions, HA or DR behavior and recovery notes.
Recovery answer
You get the gaps, the next test to run, what to fix first and whether the current recovery plan is usable.
Fit
Book this when the backup setup looks finished, but the restore process still has unanswered questions.
It fits missing restore tests, audit pressure, recovery timing questions, unclear recovery steps and HA or DR setups that need testing.
The jobs finish, files exist and alerts look quiet, but nobody can show a recent restore test that matches a real incident.
RTO and RPO values exist, but the full path has not been timed: finding the right backup, restoring it, validating it and handing it back.
The team may have notes, screenshots or memory of the process, but credentials, restore order, validation, decision points or handoff have not been checked.
Always On, clustering, log shipping, replicas or backup tooling exist, but failover and restore behavior still need testing.
Review
The review follows the recovery path from backup files to a usable service, not just the backup job status.
Chain
Full, differential and log backups, copy-only exceptions, retention, encryption, compression, checksum use, backup location and whether the required files really exist.
Point
Point-in-time restore options, log sequence coverage, data-loss expectations, tail-log backup possibility and which restore point the business would actually accept.
Time
Time to find the backup, prepare a target, copy files if needed, restore, recover, validate and hand the service back.
Target
Where the restore would run, storage capacity, SQL Server version, disk layout, permissions, service accounts and access to supporting files.
Validate
DBCC CHECKDB where appropriate, application checks, SQL Agent jobs, logins, users, linked servers, certificates, reporting and business sign-off.
Runbook
Incident triggers, restore order, command steps, owner names, approval points, communication, fallback choices and what to record.
HA/DR
Always On failover behavior, clustering, log shipping, replicas, backup preference, listener behavior, quorum concerns and what still needs a restore anyway.
Access
Who can start recovery, who can approve data loss, who can validate applications and whether the right access still exists during an incident.
Technical checks
The exact list depends on the backup setup and the incident type you care about. These are the checks I usually want answered before the recovery plan is used in production.
Output
You get a practical answer on what is restorable, how long it likely takes and what needs to be tested next.
What has been tested, what has not been tested, and which missing details matter most for recovery.
A practical view of restore timing, validation timing, likely waiting points and the first RTO/RPO mismatch to fix.
Commands, owners, checks, decision points and fallback notes that need to be written or corrected before the next test.
A focused test scope: which database, which restore point, where to restore it, what to validate and how to record the result.
Process
The first message only needs the backup setup, the recovery concern and any details already available.
Scope depends on instance count, database size, backup tooling, restore target availability, detail quality and whether a restore test is included.
Step
Send the backup setup, restore history, stated RTO/RPO, main concern, and any runbook, screenshots, job history or tool reports you already have.
Step
I check backup chains, restore options, target readiness, permissions, validation steps, HA or DR context and recovery notes.
Step
The review narrows the next test so it answers a real question instead of just restoring something easy.
Step
You get the gaps, supporting details, timing concerns, recovery-step fixes and the next recovery exercise that should happen.
Proof and reading
Related
A checklist for restore steps, dependencies, validation, owners, and handback during recovery.
Open checklist
Related
How to check backup chains, restore tests, recovery timing, dependencies, and handback.
Open guide
Related
A checklist for restore steps, dependencies, validation, and handback during recovery.
Open checklist
Fit check
Use the health audit when recovery is only one concern among jobs, monitoring, access, configuration and general production risk.
See health audit
Use performance review when blocking, deadlocks, slow queries or workload timing are already the main issue.
See performance review
Use upgrade support when the main risk is a CU, service pack, major upgrade, HA upgrade or migration path.
See upgrade support
If SQL Server is down right now, send the problem directly. A readiness review is for checking the recovery steps before the next incident.
Contact directly
Before you send it
Send the rough details, not a perfect DR pack. Backup history, restore notes and the main recovery question are enough to start.
If you have job history, recovery notes, backup-tool reports, restore timings, incident notes or audit questions, include them.
The first useful decision is whether this needs a restore test, recovery-step cleanup, a backup-chain fix or a broader health audit.
I will look at the details and tell you the sane next step. Sometimes that is a restore test. Sometimes the backup chain, runbook or validation path needs cleanup first.
FAQ
The review covers backup chains, restore points, restore targets, RTO/RPO realism, validation steps, recovery notes, HA or DR behavior, permissions and the next restore test.
No. Backup monitoring says jobs ran. Recovery readiness checks whether the right data can be restored, validated and handed back in a useful time.
Not always. A useful first pass can start from backup history, job output, screenshots, scripts, recovery notes and tool reports. Read-only access helps when the details are incomplete.
I can help plan, review or support the restore test. Whether I perform it depends on access, environment rules, target server availability and the level of hands-on work needed.
Yes. Remote review is the default when the company can share enough detail or provide controlled access to the SQL Server and backup tooling.
Scope depends on instance count, database size, backup tooling, restore target availability, detail quality, HA or DR setup and whether a restore test is included.
You get the restore testing gaps, the likely recovery timing issues, recovery-step fixes and the next test or cleanup work to do first.