Fit call
Confirm the SQL Server situation, urgency, access limits, and whether ongoing SQL Server support makes sense.
SQL Server / monthly DBA support
Ongoing SQL Server support for small companies without a full-time DBA.
I help with backups, SQL Agent jobs, monitoring, performance issues, upgrades, restore testing, and planned changes through monthly DBA support.
Support starts with a fit check. If it makes sense, we agree the first SQL Server areas to review, the access boundary, and how monthly work should be prioritized.
Confirm the SQL Server situation, urgency, access limits, and whether ongoing SQL Server support makes sense.
Check the agreed starting areas: backups, jobs, monitoring, errors, recent incidents, and planned changes.
Review agreed areas, look at recurring issues, and help with planned work before it turns into an incident.
Keep a short list of fixes, risks, decisions, and the next safe details to share.
01
Small companies where SQL Server is important, but nobody has enough time to keep checking it properly.
02
There is no full-time DBA, or SQL Server is only part of someone else's job.
03
Backups, restores, monitoring, SQL Agent jobs, or maintenance need regular review.
04
Performance problems, failed jobs, or operational questions keep coming back.
05
The business needs outsourced SQL Server support, but not a helpdesk queue or a full-time hire.
06
An upgrade, audit, migration, or high availability review is likely in the next few months.
01
We start with a fit check and choose the first SQL Server areas to review.
02
Each month covers agreed review work, troubleshooting, planned changes, and the current priority list.
03
Small issues are handled as part of support. Larger items are scoped separately before work starts.
04
You get a simple record of findings, decisions, and next steps.
The first month should make the support useful without pretending everything can be fixed immediately.
Access and sensitive data wait until the work is agreed.
Week 1
Fit check, SQL Server context, access boundary, and the first review scope.
Week 2
Baseline review of agreed areas such as backups, jobs, monitoring, errors, and recent incidents.
Week 3
Discuss findings, immediate risks, and the work that should happen first.
Week 4
Agree the monthly pattern, priority list, and what needs a separate scoped review.
The exact mix depends on the agreement, the servers, and the access that makes sense. The goal is simple: keep important SQL Server risks visible, handle recurring issues earlier, and make planned changes easier to prepare.
Some small companies only need a regular review. Others need more time around recurring issues, high availability, or planned changes.
Final scope depends on the servers, access, urgency, and agreement.
For small companies that mainly need regular SQL Server checks and a short priority list.
For outsourced SQL Server support around recurring issues, planned changes, and monthly review of agreed areas.
For high availability, frequent incidents, or a larger SQL Server responsibility.
SQL Server needs daily ownership inside the company.
There is one defined problem and no need for follow-up review.
SQL Server matters, but ongoing senior review is enough and a full-time DBA would be too much.
Formal incident response, on-call cover, and SLA-backed support are required.
The format changes by agreement, but the summary should be short enough to use.
Backups
One restore test needed.
SQL Agent
Two recurring job failures.
Performance
Blocking during the reporting window.
Storage
Data file growth needs review.
Next step
Fix the job failure first, then review the backup and restore plan.
01
24/7 on-call response is not included by default.
02
Unlimited tickets and helpdesk-style queue handling are not included by default.
03
Guaranteed response SLAs need a separate agreement.
04
Full ownership of infrastructure, application code, or cloud platform work is not part of the default scope.
05
Direct production access is not needed before we agree the work.
06
A one-off emergency fix without follow-up review is usually better handled as ad hoc consulting.
Send the company context, SQL Server situation, urgency, and whether you want monthly support or a defined review. Logs, exports, credentials, and sensitive system data can wait.
Get in touchProof before starting
Monthly support usually starts by finding the recurring gaps: monitoring, maintenance, recovery, and the small issues that keep returning.
Proof
How to check whether alerts, logs, job history, and monitoring data are useful during incidents.
Open guide /
Proof
How to review SQL Agent jobs, CHECKDB, backup jobs, cleanup, index work, and schedules.
Open guide /
Proof
How to separate backup job success from restore testing, dependencies, and handback checks.
Open guide /
It is regular senior SQL Server help for companies that need recurring review, troubleshooting, planned change support, and a clear priority list without hiring a full-time DBA.
Most small companies need backup and restore checks, SQL Agent job review, monitoring review, patch planning, performance checks, access review, and someone who can help before upgrades or risky changes. The exact scope depends on how important SQL Server is to daily work.
Yes. It is outsourced SQL Server support for companies that want regular senior DBA help without adding a full-time employee. The company still keeps an internal owner for business priorities, approvals, and access decisions.
No. Monthly DBA support is regular review and agreed SQL Server work. 24/7 on-call response, unlimited tickets, and guaranteed response SLAs need a separate agreement.
Yes, if it is part of the agreement. Always On, failover notes, quorum, alerts, and runbooks can be reviewed when high availability is part of the SQL Server risk.
Yes. Recurring waits, blocking, deadlocks, slow queries, failed jobs, query plans, indexes, statistics, tempdb, and workload timing can be reviewed as part of monthly support.
No. Start with the company context, SQL Server situation, urgency, and what kind of help you are considering. Sensitive data and access can wait.
Yes. A health audit can be a good first step when the current SQL Server state is unclear or the monthly scope needs a proper starting point.
Work is prioritized by production risk, urgency, business timing, and the details available. The output is a short priority list, not a large monthly report.
Only if that is part of the agreement. I do not imply rollover by default because monthly support scope depends on the servers, access, urgency, and expected availability.
Sometimes, for companies that need regular senior SQL Server review but not daily ownership. If SQL Server needs daily internal ownership, a full-time DBA is usually the better answer.
Monthly support is the main ongoing service. These pages help when the work starts as a guide question or a narrower review.
Use the broader consulting page when the work is not yet clearly monthly support.
Open page
Use this guide when you are still deciding what kind of SQL Server support a small company actually needs.
Open page
Use this when the first step should be a defined review of the current SQL Server estate.
Open page